A focused 15–30 day evaluation, scoped to one decision that matters.
The Decidian pilot is a defined evaluation of one workflow or decision area. It runs alongside your existing systems, uses evidence you already have, and produces a reviewable output the client can inspect, challenge, and act on.
A focused window with defined start, mid-pilot review, and close.
One workflow or question where a clearer evidence view would change how you act.
Set with the client before work begins, and reviewed at the close of the pilot.
The pilot runs alongside your existing systems.
Decidian does not replace the systems you already run. The pilot evaluates the relevant evidence in parallel with the existing environment, within the access model and scope agreed with the client — and is designed for minimal operational disruption.
Connect. Evaluate. Deliver.
A three-phase engagement structured so procurement, security, and governance teams can review it end-to-end.
Agree the decision area, scope, access model, and success criteria in writing. Identify the client-side reviewers and named engagement contacts on both sides.
Decidian Intelligence evaluates the relevant evidence in parallel with the existing environment. The pilot runs alongside current systems and does not replace them.
The client receives a reviewable decision output, identified evidence gaps, risk indicators, and recommended next steps — all traceable to the underlying evidence.
What 'a useful pilot' looks like is agreed with the client — in writing — before work begins.
The criteria are specific to the decision area under evaluation and are reviewed together at the close of the pilot.
Criteria are tied to the workflow or question under evaluation, not generic metrics.
Each criterion is written so client reviewers can judge whether it was met at the close of the pilot.
Captured in the engagement documentation alongside scope, access, and roles.
The final review walks through each criterion with the client and the evidence behind the answer.
What the client provides.
A pilot is a two-sided engagement. The following are the client's contributions to make the evaluation meaningful.
A named sponsor who owns the decision area under evaluation and can authorize scope and access.
One workflow, question, or decision where a clearer view of the evidence would change how the organization acts.
The systems, documents, or datasets needed for the agreed scope, provided under the access model documented before work begins.
A small group of client reviewers available for scoping, mid-pilot check-ins, and the final review.
Any procurement, security, privacy, or governance approvals your organization requires before an outside party evaluates data.
What the client receives.
Every deliverable is designed to be reviewed by a qualified person on the client side before it informs action.
A structured recommendation for the defined decision area, written so client reviewers can inspect the basis behind it.
What is missing from the record — information that would strengthen, weaken, or change the conclusion if it were available.
Contradictions, unresolved dependencies, and areas of elevated uncertainty surfaced from the evidence.
A short set of concrete actions the client can take next, prioritized against the pilot's success criteria.
Every conclusion links back to the specific evidence that supports it, along with what contradicts or complicates it.
One decision, made together, at the close of the pilot.
At the final review, the client chooses the next step against the agreed success criteria.
Expand into an ongoing engagement across additional decision areas, workflows, or business units.
Deepen the current pilot — add adjacent evidence, additional reviewers, or a second decision area under the same scope.
End the engagement. Data is handled per the agreed exit procedure and the client retains the deliverables.
Start with one decision that matters.
A focused 15–30 day pilot, scoped and governed on your terms.